Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
Like Reply
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
Like Reply
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
https://dronexl.co/2026/04/30/flight-198...-walkback/

No damage found

Went from a claim of drone strike to now just simply eating crow.

Maybe this is the real story on these claims. Gatwick? Only thing found was a plastic bag.
Like Reply
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
Like Reply
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)
Like Reply
Court upholds FAAs requirement for remote ID on quads (drones)


One last chance to stop the roll over and die attempt to keep DJI and Autel on the FCC Covered List. Commenting period ends May 11.

No information about the security issues have never been disclosed to the public.  No review of them has ever been done as required. It defaulted to being put on the covered list, but just before that the FCC voted themselves the right to ban DJI and Autel.   

The government cannot be allowed to just hold things over people without full disclosure.  These drones really screw up their program.  They don't like things that keep them honest.
Like Reply